Is anyone else upset by this?
Not too recently for different magazines have stated that both Katie Holmes and Victoria Beckham are the new Audrey Hepburn / s. Not only is it ridiculous to even think that any woman out there could match or even come close to the natural sense of style and beauty Audrey. But Katie and Victoria? … Eww. Katie … wannabe / stupid. Http: / / Audrey … fabulous www.tomkatcrazy.com/files/2008/11/pacificphotos060999-26507pcn-holmes.jpg / dignity. Http: / / Victoria … fake www.marieclaire.co.uk/imageBank/cache/a/Audrey-LP.jpg_e_b531446b815d841fa57ff7ac29559923.jpg / Gross. http://www.exposay.com/celebrity-photos/victoria-beckham- Olympus-fashion-week-spring-2007-Proenza-Schuller-show-fHGKWh.jpg Audrey … natural / beautiful. http://www.tutiz.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/vtl_24.jpg what are your thoughts? Finally, someone who understands me. I think I like you also GhostOfJaneDoe. I love Elizabeth Taylor too! I love all women of Old Hollywood.
I hate when magazines say they have found "The next Audrey" It's a completely ridiculous statement. On the one hand, Audrey was a lady in a million, totally irreplaceable. Ok, Katie in the picture has the very messy hair, Audrey almost always wore her hair pulled back and always looks perfect. Besides, she never downcast as Katie does most of the time, while she's out. Audrey not to expose their children to the paparazzi as much as she does it well. http://www.wallpaperez.info/wallpaper/celebrities/Katie-Holmes-1146.jpg <<I hell ?????? Yes, absolutely Audrey esq. And, VICTORIA !!!?!??!?!? How the hell is she the next Audrey? You are right, Audrey was a natural beauty. Victoria has fake boobs, fake tan and has the ability to smile. Audrey was very much a private person, Victoria had her own reality show. Very bad taste and UN-Audrey.
Name (required)
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Website